Back from the Sick Bed
Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 7:34PM
“What was the point of getting that flu shot, anyway?” I growled at my nurse practitioner wife. “Well,” she deigned with that clinical calm we’re all too familiar with, “there are different strains…”
Not much for TV, I spent some of my time in bed thinking about how best to show the transformation I wrote about in my last article—the one using a mouse-over to show Jackie’s before & after. I like the mouse-over approach, and side-by-side comparisons would work as well, but I’m thinking a short video with music is the answer.
So, regular programming will resume in a day or two with a short video clip showing the transformation of an actual client. I’ll also discuss our choice of still image, audio, and video editors as well as a few options for podsafe music. Cool stuff, so check back.
And back by popular demand, today’s before & after images are more of Danielle in her red dress and alabaster skin—a beautiful young women who wanted to try modeling. To all of you who emailed questions, I can only say that this and the previous image are from her test shoot. Regrettably, she never showed for her photoshoot. I wish she had.
Lighting: Beauty dish at camera left shot through a scrim; medium gold reflector at camera right; small silver umbrella at camera right and behind model.
Featured Comment
Jeff writes:
My wife, out of the blue, asked me last Tuesday about having a set of boudoir pictures taken of herself as a present for me. She was/is worried about her body image after having had two children. She talked to a boudoir photographer in our area and the photographer showed my wife her book which included some before/after pictures. What bothered my wife the most about the book was that she felt the photog only showed women that my wife felt were VERY physically attractive before the shoot so that there was not much “transformation” with hair, makeup and wardrobe needed for the after shots. My wife considers herself to be plain-jane and is fearful that none of her inner beauty will show in the pictures. The first thing I did was fire up the computer and show her the before and after pictures from your post on November 20th so you posted at just the right time for us. She remains undecided at the moment whether to go through with the photo session or not, but she should be making a decision soon.
Not being personally familiar with how photographers charge for photo sessions like this, the photographer said she charges $150.00 for a one hour session and then my wife must purchase either the proofs or a photo package on top of the sitting fee. I feel that the mandatory purchase is unfair if she ends up not liking the photos. I can see paying the sitting fee, but forcing her to buy the pictures? Am I wrong for feeling that way?
Response
What a wonderful gift, Jeff! To ensure its success, here are some things to consider.
Because your wife is apprehensive, she needs a photographer who connects with her, a photographer who not only sees her inner beauty—and her inner sexuality—but also understands her issues and has the requisite skills to deal with them all the way to final prints.
In terms of the session time, we’ve managed to produce some good work in one-hour test sessions of young aspiring models. But that was after an hour or so of hair and makeup, which included talking about poses and scenes as well as clothing. So, at a minimum, say, two hours of interaction. But boudoir clients—certainly our boudoir clients—aren’t young aspiring models. They’re women who’ve been married several years, have had one or more children, and have the same fears and apprehensions your wife has. And I do not believe that a one-hour session—if that’s the only time the photographer and client interact—will yield the results your wife is looking for.
As a follow-up on this topic, you might ask your wife to read these articles:
- What Is Boudoir Photography, Anyway?
- Do You Photoshop?
- So, What Is the Purpose of a Boudoir Photograph, and Why Do So Many Miss the Mark?
Now to the cost, or more precisely, what you get for your money. (I won’t address the actual amount, because it’s pointless comparing rates from different parts of the country and from photographers with different skill sets.) Photographers who set low session fees have an expectation that their profit will come from print or DVD sales. And many do set minimum purchase amounts. But until now, I had not heard of a case where the client wasn’t able to see the results of her session without paying for proofs. This seems heavy-handed to me, but then again, I might have misread your comment, so please let me know if I did.
Remember, it’s a business, so the photographer’s profit must come from somewhere. In your wife’s case, it’s obviously not coming from the session, so it must come from print sales. And if the photographer makes that all-important connection with your wife and the print prices are reasonable, then it could be a bargain. On the other hand, if that connection is missing, then cost is irrelevant.
WillT |
7 Comments |
Before and After,
Danielle 



